Strapi vs Prismic: A Comprehensive Headless CMS Comparison

General
Company Size	75	70+
Stars	60K	❌
NPM Weekly Downloads	90 K	❌
Funding	$31M Series B	20M Series A
Country of Origin	France	France
Developer Experience
Hosting	PaaS + Self Hosted	SaaS
Open Source	✅	❌
API Tokens	✅	✅
Design System	https://design-system.strapi.io/	❌
GraphQL	✅	✅
Documentation	✅	✅
Authentication & Permissions	✅	✅
Multi-databases support (SQLite, MySQL, Postgres)	PostgreSQL, SQLite, MySQL and MariaDB	❌
Single Types	✅	✅
Custom fields	✅	✅
Webhooks	✅	✅
Codebase language	JavaScript, TypeScript, React	?
API Playground	❌	❌
Customizable API	✅	❌
JWT authentication	✅	❌
Content modeling	✅	✅
Plugins	✅	❌
SDK	❌	✅
Cron	✅	❌
Editing Experience
Previews	Has to be setup manually	✅
Scheduling	❌	✅
Media Library	✅	✅
Draft & Publish	✅	✅
Collaboration
Releases	✅	✅
Review Workflows	✅	❌
Versionning	❌	✅
i18n	✅	✅
Marketplace	✅	❌
Real-time editing	❌	✅
Visual editing	❌	✅
Security & Compliance
SSO	✅	✅
Audit Logs	✅	✅
Role Base Access Control	✅	✅

When choosing a headless content management system (CMS), Strapi and Prismic are two popular options that offer unique features and capabilities. Understanding their strengths and differences will help you select the best CMS for your project needs.

Overview

Strapi is an open-source headless CMS built with JavaScript, offering a high degree of customization and control. It's known for its flexibility, allowing developers to tailor the CMS to fit their specific requirements. Strapi is self-hosted, giving users complete control over their infrastructure and data.

Prismic is a cloud-based headless CMS that provides a user-friendly interface and a robust set of features for content management. It focuses on ease of use for content creators and developers alike, with a strong emphasis on content modeling and API integration.

Features

Strapi offers:

• Open-Source Customization: Strapi’s open-source nature allows for extensive customization and extension, fitting various project needs.
• Customizable API: Developers can create custom APIs easily, enabling efficient content delivery.
• Self-Hosted Option: Complete control over hosting and infrastructure, ideal for those who want to manage their environment.
• Role-Based Access Control: Advanced access control to manage user permissions effectively.
• Extensible Plugin System: Support for plugins to extend functionalities as needed.

Prismic provides:

• User-Friendly Interface: An intuitive interface designed for ease of use, allowing content creators to manage and publish content effortlessly.
• Content Modeling: Flexible content modeling with custom types and slices for structured content.
• Cloud-Based Hosting: Managed hosting with automatic scaling, ensuring reliable performance and reduced maintenance.
• Rich API: Robust APIs for integrating content into applications with ease.
• Scheduled Releases: Ability to schedule content releases, enhancing content management workflows.

Performance

Strapi offers strong performance, particularly when self-hosted. Its customizable architecture allows developers to optimize the CMS based on specific needs, potentially enhancing content delivery speed.

Prismic ensures reliable performance through its cloud infrastructure, handling high traffic and large volumes of content efficiently. Its managed hosting and automatic scaling contribute to consistent performance.

Flexibility and Customization

Strapi excels in flexibility and customization. Developers can adjust nearly every aspect of the CMS, from the admin panel to API endpoints, making it suitable for projects requiring tailored solutions or unique workflows.

Prismic offers significant flexibility in content modeling and integration. Its user-friendly interface and content slices allow for dynamic content management, though customization is more limited compared to Strapi’s open-source approach.

Pricing

Strapi is a cost-effective option due to its open-source nature, with no licensing fees. Costs are mainly related to hosting and maintenance, which can be scaled according to project requirements.

Prismic uses a tiered pricing model based on usage and features. Pricing includes cloud hosting and support, making it a comprehensive solution but potentially more expensive, especially for larger projects.

Conclusion

Choosing between Strapi and Prismic depends on your project's specific needs. If you require a highly customizable, open-source solution with full control over your data and infrastructure, Strapi is a strong choice. If you prefer a cloud-based CMS with an easy-to-use interface, flexible content modeling, and managed hosting, Prismic is an excellent option.

Consider your project requirements, budget, and technical preferences to determine which CMS best aligns with your goals. Both Strapi and Prismic offer valuable features, ensuring you can effectively manage and deliver your content.